Bonsai Vault  Forum Index
  Home  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups RegisterRegister ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
 
Welcome
Welcome to Bonsai Vault .

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

The rules and their relation to visual arts - Part2

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bonsai Vault Forum Index -> The rules and their relation to visual arts - Part 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tachigi
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Posts: 187
Location: Glen Rock, Pa, 6b

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject: The rules and their relation to visual arts - Part2 Reply with quote

This thread is for sharing views on the article The rules and their relation to visual arts / Part 2 by Emil Brannstrom
_________________
Tom Brown
www.shadysidebonsai.com
www.4MAAT.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Taylor Brown



Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Emil, I read your article both parts Smile I am not sure all of what you said but have a pretty good idea what you are saying. Had to look up some of the words to understand it better. I think this will help in designing my scotts. I had a plan but I think I will rethink it. One question please, you wrote this

Quote:
it belongs in the realm of two dimensional representations of depth. Why is that distinction important? Because foreshortening can be used to make something appear shorter without actually making it shorter ! An easy way to destroy the sense of depth and flatten any 2 dimensional representation is to place two different elements close enough to touch but without any of them overlapping the other, which is called a tangent in visual arts (Figure 2).


but your picture shows this




the two foliage pads that are listed better and better both overlap which make it look like it has depth. So I don't understand I am not getting what your telling me I guess for this. I understand the rest pretty well I am just stuck here

Thank you for writing this
_________________
Taylor

To get a 100% - You have to give 110%
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emil Brannstrom



Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Taylor Brown wrote:

An easy way to destroy the sense of depth and flatten any 2 dimensional representation is to place two different elements close enough to touch but without any of them overlapping the other, which is called a tangent in visual arts (Figure 2).

but your picture shows this




the two foliage pads that are listed better and better both overlap which make it look like it has depth. So I don't understand I am not getting what your telling me I guess for this. I understand the rest pretty well I am just stuck here

Thank you for writing this


Heya Taylor!

I'm happy you find my article useful! What I meant was that if you place the trunk and foliage as close as in the first of the three pictures,it looks flat since it's imposible to tell wich one lies in front of the other. If you make the foliage overlap the trunk you help the viewer understand what's in front or back. So, you are correct that the two pictures that are listed better and better make it look like it has depth,while the first picture looks flat.

The reason there is no picture listed as "best" is because wich one that's best is impossible to tell without seeing the whole tree. Perhaps there shouldn't even be a branch in that place. That would make all three pictures bad, but the two that overlap would still have depth!

If I misunderstod your question, please let me know.

Regards
Emil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ash Barns
Moderator


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 92
Location: Victoria Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well written article Emil. Tying in the perspectives of art with bonsai design does make a lot of sense and gives us a clearer understanding of why this is important. If we take Better #1 the branch has been wired and brought toward the viewer allowing part of the pad to overlap the trunk. In the case of Better #2 the branch has been swung to the rear allowing us a glimpse of the pad to the right but still giving a strong left hand view of the pad. As you said no reduction in the branch length just a different way of showing us how to get that depth.

Does that help you Ms. Taylor?

Ash Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bonsai Vault Forum Index -> The rules and their relation to visual arts - Part 2 All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Download our forum toolbar

Powered by phpBB